I recently started a rather unusual social experiment: for 30 days in a row, I substituted a single weekly newsletter for my regular barrage of individual texts to friends. At first, I thought the idea was a fun challenge, a way to improve my communication and maybe even add some formality to my infamously informal friendships. I had no idea that this endeavor would turn into a deep investigation of efficiency, connection, & the nuanced art of personal broadcasting. I didn’t make this choice because I suddenly detested emojis or instant messaging’s brevity. Instead, it was a result of an increasing feeling of overwhelm.
My phone buzzed nonstop with half-formed ideas, disjointed conversations, and the incessant back-and-forth of planning. I felt that my digital interactions were superficial and fragmented. I also noticed that I struggled to express longer ideas within the confines of a text bubble and that I was repeatedly updating multiple people.
Texting overwhelmed me. I often started my day with a dozen unread texts, each demanding a separate reply, a unique emoji, or a tailored anecdote. It felt like I was constantly on call, performing a digital dance that drained me rather than connecting me. I frequently forgot to tell one friend about a humorous incident I’d already shared with another due to the unexpected mental overhead of managing these private conversations.
I yearned for more than just surface-level exchanges. I wanted to share my reflections, discoveries, and the nuanced stories that often get lost in the rapid-fire nature of texting.
Instead of expecting my friends to respond immediately, I envisioned a place where I could carefully formulate my ideas, present them, and let them take their time. I embraced the “absurd” and allowed myself to be more genuine and thoughtful in my interactions.
| Day | Number of Friends | Feedback Received |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | Positive |
| 2 | 12 | Neutral |
| 3 | 15 | Positive |
| 4 | 11 | Negative |
| 5 | 13 | Positive |
| 6 | 14 | Neutral |
| 7 | 16 | Positive |
| 8 | 10 | Positive |
| 9 | 12 | Neutral |
| 10 | 15 | Positive |
| 11 | 11 | Negative |
| 12 | 13 | Positive |
| 13 | 14 | Neutral |
| 14 | 16 | Positive |
| 15 | 10 | Positive |
| 16 | 12 | Neutral |
| 17 | 15 | Positive |
| 18 | 11 | Negative |
| 19 | 13 | Positive |
| 20 | 14 | Neutral |
| 21 | 16 | Positive |
| 22 | 10 | Positive |
| 23 | 12 | Neutral |
| 24 | 15 | Positive |
| 25 | 11 | Negative |
| 26 | 13 | Positive |
| 27 | 14 | Neutral |
| 28 | 16 | Positive |
| 29 | 10 | Positive |
| 30 | 12 | Neutral |
One aspect of the appeal was the sheer ridiculousness of sending a personal newsletter to my closest friends. It seemed like a lighthearted way to challenge communication conventions and make fun of the constant need for instant satisfaction that permeates our digital lives. I anticipated raised eyebrows, perhaps a few bewildered texts (which, ironically, I’d have to resist replying to instantly), and hopefully, a good laugh from my inner circle.
I needed a plan before I threw myself into this experiment. This involved more than just choosing email over text; it involved creating an experience and making sure my newsletter wasn’t just another unread message in their inbox. Despite the fact that my “subscribers” were not paying clients but rather my closest friends, I took into account the accepted best practices for newsletters.
Choosing the Right Rhythm. After getting some expert guidance, I quickly opted for a weekly schedule. It seemed to be the perfect balance—frequent enough to keep my friends informed and engaged, yet not overwhelming for either party. The goal was to maintain the connection.
As part of my weekly release commitment, I intend to distribute it on Tuesdays. I had read that Tuesdays were ideal for socializing because they gave friends a chance to catch up after the weekend rush and before the pre-weekend rush. writing the “Terms and Conditions.”. Setting expectations was more important in my first “newsletter” than providing updates. They described the bizarre bizarre bizarre bizarre bizarre bizarre bizarre bizarre things.
I made it clear that unless there was an emergency—which I loosely defined as “something involving actual medical attention or a natural disaster”—I would not be responding to individual texts for the next thirty days. I also encouraged them to reply to the newsletter itself with their thoughts, questions, or critiques. This first outreach was important because it established the tone and, hopefully, generated some support for my unusual endeavor. Content Strategy and Length.
I was aware that my newsletter couldn’t be an unstructured, rambling tirade. For weekly newsletters, experts recommend a word count of 500–1,500 to provide value without overburdening readers. This seemed like a worthwhile goal. It allowed me enough space to delve into topics, share anecdotes, and offer personal reflections, without requiring a significant time commitment from my friends.
I intended to include a variety of personal updates, intriguing things I’d discovered or seen, sporadic suggestions, and maybe even a brief introspective essay. The goal was to mimic a contemplative discussion in writing. As the weeks went by, the newsletter turned into an unexpectedly delightful and enriching aspect of my daily routine. It made me more mindful of my surroundings, watch my life for moments that could be shared, and express my experiences with a fresh perspective. Choosing My Week. I would set aside time every week, usually on Mondays, to write my newsletter.
This was not a responsibility. I would look back on the previous week, analyzing my observations, talks, and memories. What is it that I am doing?
I began with a straightforward summary of my week, including what I did, who I saw, and what I observed. However, I soon discovered that I was going into more contemplative territory. Anecdotes and personal insights. Funny accidents, minor successes, and occasionally even vulnerabilities would be shared. One week, for example, I talked about a terrible baking attempt that resulted in a smoke alarm concert, interspersed with my dog’s frantic barking.
I thought about the unanticipated delight of rekindling an old pastime for another week. These personal touches, I hoped, made the newsletter feel less like a formal update and more like a conversation with a friend. Discoveries and recommendations. I also included sections about things I was enjoying, like a new podcast, an interesting article, & a tasty recipe that I tried.
TThis enabled me to expand the dialogue past just my own experiences, delivering value and igniting potential shared interests. I consistently made it a point to succinctly explain my suggestions, infusing a personal element that a simple hyperlink couldn’t capture. A Glimpse.
In response, a friend said, “This feels like getting a handwritten letter, but digital!”. A Pings Welcome Pause. A number of friends said they were relieved to have a brief break from the incessant text notifications. Instead of feeling compelled to reply right away, they valued being able to read my updates at their own pace.
One friend said, “I can just read it when I have five minutes instead of checking my phone every time it buzzes. It’s like getting a curated digest of your life.”. This confirmed my original theory regarding the overwhelming number of pings. Deeper Convers Deeper Convers Deeper Convers Deeper Convers Deeper Engagements. The quality of the interactions that the newsletters sparked was perhaps the most unexpected and satisfying result. Instead of fragmented exchanges, I started receiving longer, more thoughtful email replies.
Friends would ask follow-up questions that showed genuine interest, mention specific anecdotes I shared, or share their own similar experiences. It felt like we were actually conversing with each other, rather than just exchanging information. This informal metric, which mirrored professional advice on measuring success, indicated that I had found a good balance.
Despite the absence of a formal unsubscribe button for my friends, I closely monitored any signs of disengagement. No one stopped reading my emails, and no one requested to be removed from the list, so my personal “unsubscribe rate” was essentially zero. This informal metric, which aligned with professional advice on measuring success, suggested that I had achieved a successful balance.
As the 30-day mark approached, I found myself reflecting on what I had discovered. What had I learned? How had this experiment transformed my communication style? Would I continue with this unconventional practice?
The most significant takeaway from this experiment was the power of intentional communication. When I sat down to create each newsletter, I carefully considered what to include, how to present it, and the message I wanted to convey. In contrast, my text conversations were often impulsive and reactive, lacking this level of thoughtfulness. The newsletter forced me to slow down, think, and communicate with purpose.
This experiment also led me to develop a new type of relationship. The newsletter encouraged a slower, more in-depth interaction, while texting often prioritizes instant and transient connections. This allowed me to reflect while creating the content and for my friends to reflect while reading and replying. Compared to the constant barrage of fleeting texts, this fostered a sense of connection that felt more substantial and nourishing. Ultimately, this experiment demonstrated the long-term sustainability of intentional communication.
I’m not giving up on texting entirely. Text messages will still be used for urgent matters and quick check-ins. However, I’ve decided to keep sending out a monthly newsletter to my closest friends, and maybe even reach out to distant family members.
While it’s manageable, the weekly schedule might be a bit too demanding for a long-term personal commitment. Since I’ve developed a habit and noticed the early benefits, the advice to choose a consistent cadence and commit for 90 days before evaluating results now makes perfect sense to me. Consistency is key.
I’ve also internalized the advice from experts that consistency is crucial. I believe my newsletter was successful because my friends knew when to expect it. Audiences, even a small group of close friends, value reliability. I discovered that regular attendance, even in a small way, gradually increases engagement and fosters trust. Looking back, it was more than just a fun challenge to send my friends a weekly newsletter instead of texts for 30 days. It was a transformative experiment that completely changed my perspective on modern communication.
In this increasingly fragmented digital world, it taught me the value of thoughtful expression, the unexpected joys of personal broadcasting, and the profound satisfaction of deepening connections. Who knows, perhaps one of my friends will launch a newsletter in return at some point. Of course, I’ll subscribe.

Leave a Reply